🔗 Share this article

Following a significant regulatory appeal, a national review panel has overturned a prior decision that prevented Australian-based users from seeing recorded content of the violent event involving conservative commentator Charlie Kirk. This challenge was lodged by Elon Musk's company X, which contested an directive issued at the request of the online safety regulator.

Details of the Case and Ban

After the death of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University in last year, the regulator applied to the classification board to assess and rate the circulating video. The board initially ruled the content was "refused classification", a designation that allowed the regulator to instruct social media companies to restrict access to the posts for users in Australia.

Elon Musk's company challenged the decision for two separate videos depicting the Kirk incident. Additionally, it contested a similar ruling on a separate video—depicting the assault of Iryna Zarutska on a train in Charlotte—which had also been deemed "unacceptable for distribution".

The Platform's Case and Board's Decision

In its appeal, X contended that the footage in question contained only a short moment of violence with the weapon not shown. It was argued the footage was grainy and the focus shifted rapidly from the victim to the bystanders.

X maintained the footage was not excessively detailed, exploitative, or objectionable, stating it served as a factual documentation of "a significant incident of historical and political significance that prompted widespread discussion". The platform drew a parallel between the video and the historic film of President John F. Kennedy's assassination.

Most members of the classification panel ultimately agreed that, "despite the terrible nature of the event," the video did not reach a level that was exploitative, gratuitous, or offensive enough to justify a complete ban. However, they noted that a more detailed depiction with different editing might have resulted in a different ruling. Consequently, the board changed the rating of the content to R18+.

The Minority Viewpoint

Some on the board held a contrary view, arguing the video was "a shareable video for the probable aim of entertainment and/or personal gain (such as engagement metrics)". They also argued the parallel with the JFK assassination tape was invalid, as that footage was released long after the assassination, "once emotions regarding it had subsided".

Reactions to the Decision

In a statement on its global government affairs account, the platform expressed approval of the decision.

"We challenged this case to uphold freedom of expression and the critical nature of public access about matters of public significance. Our commitment remains committed to safeguarding these fundamental values."

A spokesperson for the safety regulator also welcomed the board's decision, but noted that the revised classification now implies platforms "must take steps to ensure R18+ material being displayed to users who are minors".

Broader Context on Sensitive Footage

In related news, the regulator did not issue take-down orders to platforms this week regarding disturbing videos from the Sydney beach incident shared across social media. Officials commented that while the content were upsetting, they did not reach the high threshold for a "total ban" rating.

Instead, the companies have been advised to use warning labels and screens, such as obscuring the image, on such content in accordance with their own content policies.